The NaMoRal Dilemma

This is a con­fus­ing piece, sim­ply because I am confused!

I don’t think we have ever had such a polar­iz­ing per­son as a Prime Min­is­te­r­ial can­di­date. And like so many peo­ple not liv­ing in Gujarat, despite being Gujarati myself, I have extremely mixed feelings!

Hav­ing grown up with the lib­er­al­ism and ideals imbued by the “kurta, jeans, jho­las” triad, what hap­pened at Godhra in 2002 cre­ated an instant antipa­thy towards Mr. Modi and his cronies. I was con­vinced that he needed to be brought to justice!

The first sign that I was see­ing just one side of the story was dur­ing a casual din­ner con­ver­sa­tion with my uncle from Ahmed­abad, where I heard how proud they were of Mr. Modi, both in terms of what hap­pened dur­ing 2002 as well as in terms of the changes he has wrought in the state, some­thing no one denies (though there are voices that say there could be even more growth in Gujarat if there was more empha­sis on Eng­lish and the ser­vices’ sector).

Any­way, I then started speak­ing to more and more peo­ple in Gujarat and some more Gujaratis of my par­ents’ generation…the vast major­ity are pro-Modi in vir­tu­ally all senses. At the same time, if the din­ner table has non-Gujaratis or even Gujaratis who are not par­tic­u­larly right-wing, the debate gets quite virulent…no one is neutral…you are either pro or anti.

And frankly, as long as Mr. Modi’s ambi­tions were con­fined to Gujarat, it didn’t per­haps mat­ter, in the larger scheme of things. Now that he could be the Prime Min­is­ter if the BJP wins the next elec­tions (or he spear­heads a BJP win), obvi­ously, the issue goes beyond din­ner table debates.

Many Gujaratis are unhappy with Mr. Modi becom­ing PM, because it would mean he would be mov­ing away from Gujarat. Oth­ers are unhappy because of the 2002 issues.

If there were a viable alter­na­tive, this per­haps would not be very rel­e­vant. If the Con­gress wins, we get Mr. Rahul Gandhi as PM. Run­ning a coun­try is equiv­a­lent to being the CEO of a large cor­po­ra­tion and you need con­sid­er­able expe­ri­ence and exper­tise. Mr. Gandhi pos­sesses none and can­not in all seri­ous­ness be con­sid­ered for the post…leave aside the other related issues. In that con­text, no one can deny the hands-on expe­ri­ence that Mr. Modi brings to the table. And within the BJP? No one has the charisma or the abil­ity to be con­sid­ered a national leader at this point in time.

From a com­plete anti-Modi stance in the early 2000s, I am now con­fused, ambiva­lent and trou­bled. Yes, we know what hap­pened in 2002. But shit hap­pens and peo­ple make mis­takes! And then, on the other hand is the unde­ni­able fact that today he is the best PM can­di­date that we have.

Jain­ism tells us to for­give and for­get peo­ple their past actions. But this power can only belong to the vic­tims and those affected, not us. Hin­duism is com­pletely ambiva­lent on this issue, given the kind of vio­lence and grey zones that per­vade our mythol­ogy. Chris­tian­ity urges for­give­ness if asked for. In Judaism, this is the only crime that has no for­give­ness unless the per­son affected gives abso­lu­tion, and even then…

It has been a long time since any indi­vid­ual in the pub­lic arena has affected me or trou­bled me so much! Obvi­ously what I think or feel does not mat­ter to Mr. Modi. But I know that there are many like me…stuck with their feel­ings and not sure how to han­dle them!

Does any­one else have a dif­fer­ent or wiser world-view on this?

 

34 Comments

  • GS Dastur wrote:

    It all depends on whether Mr Modi is a decent man who made a hor­rific blun­der, or a ruth­less man mas­querad­ing as a decent, effi­cient leader.
    Maybe the cam­paign process will reveal more.

  • Jain­ism tells us to for­give and for­get peo­ple their past actions. But this power can only belong to the vic­tims and those affected, not us.” — This is not about FORGIVING, it is about not REWARDING morally bank­rupt behav­iour. Behind the sup­port for Modi is the think­ing that “finally we have some­one who knows how to put THEM in their place”. Them = the OTHER, today it is Islam, tomor­row it could be any other reli­gion or com­mu­nity or caste that peo­ple think doesn’t suit their con­ve­nience. This path is dark­ness and chaos and the loss of every­thing decent.

  • Frankly, I’ll take a bungling lead­er­ship any day over this kind of chill­ing cold-blooded violence.

  • Govind Gadiyar wrote:

    Modi is a busi­ness man and he has suc­ceeded as a busi­ness man. There are two prob­lems with him as I think.

    1. He has no vision for India. All the time he has been lim­it­ing him­self to Gujarat till today.

    2. Sec­ond is quite impor­tant. All these years he has failed to cre­ate a team for Gujrat BJP or a suc­ces­sor. This sec­ond point will be bar­rier for him to reach the PM chair. With­out a reli­able team and a good suc­ces­sor he is des­tined for fail­ure just like LK Advani.

    Any way let us wait and see. His becom­ing a PM is not going to change the things in India.

  • Jayesh Desai wrote:

    When I was stu­dent of khalsa col­lege in 1972, there was hon­ey­comb in front of the build­ing hang­ing from the ceil­ing, one fine win­ter morn­ing some­one threw large stone and broke it, I remem­ber run­ning right in front of present day reliance mall and still one of us had to endure bee sting in scalp! Your arti­cle will have same effect!
    Seri­ously, in south Gujarat from where I come, I have seen same effect on Gujarati’s, but I have not seen any improve­ment in cor­rup­tion or law break­ing ten­den­cies of gujarati, eng­lish is still spo­ken in hor­ri­fy­ing man­ner. So I have seri­ous doubts on that account, but then I may be wrong. As roads are bet­ter, peo­ple are upbeat and opti­mistic, which i can say is com­pletely oppo­site of what we see in Mum­bai.
    Some­thing in lighter vein next time, please?

  • sriganesh wrote:

    No one talks about the sikh mas­sacare in Delhi. The cul­prits in the Con­gress party are so many and no legal rem­edy has come up. The party had one PM after the other and no one both­ered to even apol­o­gize to this com­mu­nity of India which boasts itself of not hav­ing a sin­gle beg­ger. Finally Con­gress party elected Man­mo­han Singh who apol­o­gized which obvi­ously went unheard.

    I know I have mixed feel­ing with this man but at least he gives me the feel­ing that he will not mess around with the coun­try and spread incom­petance and chaltha hai attitude.

    I would like to try him out but keep a vigil that he does not mess around with any reli­gious communities.

  • devdee mehta wrote:

    this is too early to think n com­ment bcos its just media hype,nothing prac­ti­cal n authen­tic. lets wish who soever becomes pm may be rahul,nitish,shushma or modi , india must progress n india is not at all in bad shape,looking towards the world posi­tion. so gd luck india.

  • The riots in 2002,which some peo­ple and espe­cially print and elec­tronic media love to talk about,whenever the sub­ject of NM comes up,were a REACTION to Godhra train burning.they for­get this fact very very conviniently.There is no way,the mas­sacre and blood­shed can be jus­ti­fied but nei­ther can the train burning!In past thou­sand years his­tory India and espe­cially Gujrat,has been attacked looted,religious places destroyed many times by the muslims.After 2002,Gujrat was specif­i­cally tar­geted for the bomb blasts,I won­der why this same peo­ple donot even men­tion it once!Today peo­ple liv­ing in Gujrat donot talk as much about the riots but pseu­dosec­u­lar­ists do!Whether NM is suiat­able as PM can­di­date or not is debat­able but Rahul Gandhi is def­i­nitely unsuitable!

  • H.L. Chulani wrote:

    ’ But shit hap­pens and peo­ple make mis­takes ‘? But,shit does not kill more than a thou­sand peo­ple in a state of which Mr. Modi hap­pens to be the CM. The same hap­pened in 1984 with the Sikhs– shit killed! Should we say ‘Oh shit’ and just move on? This is a crazy coun­try and most lead­ers are big­ots.
    Sorry, do not enough wis­dom or world-view!

  • udayan.g.govekar wrote:

    Modi will be Prime Min­is­ter of Gujrat,not of India,my choice is Arun Jaitely,or Nitishkumar.Both can lead from front,Nitishkumar will be more like Lal­ba­hadur shas­triji, very rural son of Bharat.whereasArun Jaitely will be more like Rajiv Gandhi of India.who can for­get how Modi,screwed up san­jay Joshi a RSS activist,&how these halfchad­di­walas like Mohan Bhag­wat looked the other way.Like Kehub­hai Patel tried to side line Namo dur­ing his stint as C,M.& NAMO emerged vic­to­ri­ous, in the same man­ner one day san­jay joshi will rise to become C.M of Gujrat.Jai Hind.

  • Lot depends on people’s per­cep­tion out­side Gujarat. Frankly I don’t think BJP will come into power. In that case u know who will be PM and it will be nightmarish

  • Jigish Modi wrote:

    Today a Mus­lim leader can cre­ate a huge ruckus about an enter­tain­ment film and an Hindu feels an urge to leave the coun­try!! Just who­ever is sup­port­ing the Mus­lims.. I want to ask is this jus­ti­fied.. In a sec­u­lar demo­c­ra­tic India (Hin­dus­tan) where a Mus­lim can dic­tate terms and a Hindu film­maker has to take a bow, is this going to be our future? Well hon­estly that is also not tol­er­a­ble… Those peo­ple who burnt sev­eral Hin­dus in God­hara train were never booked and are still mov­ing scott free. Can this be jus­ti­fied? No And killing of Mus­lims can­not also be jus­ti­fied. But who is the minor­ity here? Hin­dus or Mus­lims? Who is dic­tat­ing to Kamala Has­san? Why are we so shit scared of Mus­lims? Well we require some­one to show them the place where they belong.. In Kurla and sev­eral places we see Green Pak­istani flags dur­ing their fes­ti­val… How can this be allowed? Hon­estly I do not like the way of pol­i­tics, but some­one has to do the dirty work!!!

  • bakin nayak wrote:

    The golden line in your piece is where you say the power to for­give lies with the vic­tims. One sees no such change, besides where has the man him­self ever acknowl­edged any wrong ? Dan­ger­ous times are surely in store with the likes of Owaisi and Toga­dia stok­ing the pre elec­tion fires and the Tem­ple bal­loon being reinflated.

  • Most lead­ers with few excep­tions have come with their share of ‘shit’. Maybe we should assume Mr Modi has fin­ished his share before being in office. It augurs well for the future of India.
    Also, my per­sonal opin­ion, India needs a India-centric leader and not a image-obsessed novice. The need of the hour is progress.

  • V.Subramanian wrote:

    The cur­rent PM is the most erudite,touted as the most hon­est per­ceived as a clean per­son.
    Unfor­tu­natedly he has turned out to be a facade and has presided over the most cor­rupt cabinet.Not sur­pris­ing at all.By per­pet­u­at­ing a sin­gle party rule and patro­n­is­ing the hege­mony of a sin­gle fam­ily ‚we had handed over the “License to Loot” on a plat­ter to UPA 2. The party that dom­i­nated the polit­i­cal land­scape in the coun­try for well over five decades,has with the con­nivance of media,deceitfully suc­ceeded in brand­ing BJP as a com­mu­nal party. BJP also helped them by their involve­ment in the demo­li­tion of Babri Majid.Secularism in this coun­try is a con­fus­ing con­cept. The self-styled intellectuals,especially in the rul­ing party,have cham­pi­oned the cause of sec­u­lar­ism by sub­si­dis­ing Haj travel,Banning Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nas­reen and patro­n­is­ing the nude paint­ings of God and Godesses by MF Hussain.No one has a issue in MFH paint­ing nude char­ac­ters. But labelling them as “Sarawathi” “Par­vathi” and “Kali” seems sin­is­ter and highly objectionable.These Sec­u­lar­ists are strangely silent on the Fatwa against the “All girls Band” in the val­ley.
    The extent of involve­ment or oth­er­wise of NaMo in the 2002 riots is being exam­ined by the Judi­ciary under the super­vi­sion of supreme court.But the peo­ple of Gujarat have given their ver­dict very clearly. The posi­tion of BJP allies in the NDA and its poten­tial allies, will deter­mine the choice of PM’s candidate.For those who think modi as only pro business,his speech to Sri­ram Col­lege of Com­merce, stu­dents was a refresh­ing revelation.He is equally focussed on Agriculture,services,health, Environment,education,tourism apart from Industry.His track record of Gov­er­nance is impec­ca­ble. Hope­fully he has learned from his mis­takes in 2002, and with the omnipres­ence of OB vans and an increas­ingly vig­i­lant civil soci­ety there should be no room for repeat of 1984 or 2002.There is no room for repeat of the mis­takes peo­ple made in 2009 as well.

  • Sujata Morab wrote:

    A prime min­is­ter is rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the coun­try. Amer­ica is one coun­try whose rela­tion­ship mat­ters. And it is deny­ing visa to him!
    Modi is a gujrati leader. Indian pol­i­tics is vastly diverse from Gujrat pol­i­tics. Lis­ten to his speeches. Does he speak like a national leader. Nah! Sounds like a juvenile.

  • Dear Dr.Jhankaria,
    I was sur­prised to read a sen­tence in your arti­cle say­ing that Hin­duism is ambiva­lent on the issue of forgiveness.You make this state­ment on the basis of your read­ing of Hindu mythology.Even a minor google search gives a lot of information.I include one quote :It says every­thing that a human being needs to know.
    (From Mahab­harata, Udyoga Parva Sec­tion XXXIII, Trans­lated by Sri Kisari Mohan Gan­guli.)
    The Hindu leader Vidura said,

    For­give­ness sub­dues (all) in this world; what is there that for­give­ness can­not achieve? What can a wicked per­son do unto him who car­ries the sabre of for­give­ness in his hand? Fire falling on the grass­less ground is extin­guished of itself. And the unfor­giv­ing indi­vid­ual defiles him­self with many enor­mi­ties. Right­eous­ness is the one high­est good; and for­give­ness is the one supreme peace; knowl­edge is the one supreme con­tent­ment; and benev­o­lence, one sole hap­pi­ness. (From Mahab­harata, Udyoga Parva Sec­tion XXXIII, Trans­lated by Sri Kisari Mohan Gan­guli.)
    Other web­sites include infor­ma­tion on the philo­soph­i­cal under­pin­nings of the con­cept of for­give­ness in Hin­duism.
    Hin­duism is reli­gion with a very devel­oped philo­soph­i­cal tra­di­tion and we would all be well served by a greater expo­sure to its philosophies.Our view on Hin­duism can­not be lim­ited to mythol­ogy and Amar Chi­tra Katha
    Best.

  • Modi is first of all a ’ NO NONSENSE ‘fel­low.
    I hated him when he vis­ited Raipur, nearly Two weeks before becom­ing CM of Gujarat.We asked him why it was that ticket col­lec­tors and con­duc­tors in rail­ways, used to talk to us in Hindi,when we spoke in Gujarati.They inten­tion­ally try to harass us, we being Gujarati s from other states.What should we do for this? His reply was Don’t come to Gujarat.No Nonsense

  • But as the time passed I could realise that he was cor­rect. Instead of giv­ing false promises like lead­ers of Congress,he was straight for­ward. India had in past, two best
    admin­is­tra­tors in pol­i­tics. 1.Sardar Patel and Rafi Ahmed Kid­wai. Modi is out-spoken like Sar­dar Patel and he has proved when and where to hit for the bast results.I am sec­u­lar, but my sec­u­lar­ism does not allow anybody/ any minor­ity to wash fish on your

  • head. I do agree with Deepali, Jigish Modi and V. Sub­ra­ma­nium, there should be a check on extrem­ist behav­iour, unnec­es­sary importance/patronage to any­body whether reli­gious or lin­guis­tic or cast, creed finan­cial minor­ity or major­ity. Let not bite but must show the atti­tude to bite, if nec­es­sary. Those who were younger than Six years,when emer­gancy was laid by Mrs. Gandhi,
    do not know how thw whole nation had arose

  • within FIFTEEN days, as soon as the emer­gency was lifted, and thrown away Con­gress rule from Cen­tre and Showed Mrs. Gandhi her real place.
    His­tory can repeat itself, as it usu­ally does. I do wish NaMo becomes PM and leads the nation to progress as done in case of Gujarat.

  • There is one thing for sure, that in any busi­ness small or big, the Boss is respon­si­ble for mak­ing it or break­ing it.
    The present PM, who they say is goody goody, is (sorry have to respect the chair).
    Narashima Rao the then PM was respon­si­ble for the demol­ish­ing of the Babri Masjid. He did not take any action even after know­ing very well about the build up of the forces in that sen­si­tive area.
    He should have resigned imme­di­ately.
    This was the begin­ning of our woes, bomb blast and all. Thanks to Advani and his yatra.
    Rajiv Gandhi was respon­si­ble for the Sikh killings in 1984, by mouthing these words. When a huge tree falls.….
    and so on…

    Agree that each and every­one who com­mits these atroc­i­ties should be taken to task, should be tried and pun­ished severely so that there should be no repeats, whether they are from A B or C party.
    We are very good at com­plain­ing and going back centuries,cribbing that we were looted and booted by so and so.…Can we change that? Today we are looted and worse by our own peo­ple and we can do noth­ing, except fight among our­selves, play­ing into the hands of these ras­cals.
    I find it silly to think of what hap­pened cen­turies ago and fight, when one can be happy, live a life of con­tent­ment, a good life. We can­not change what took place then. Why fight and be mis­er­able in our present lives. Surely there are so many of us strug­gling to keep the wolf at bay, to feed, clothe and edu­cate the kids.
    There are so many who go to bed with­out a decent meal. Guess we are all respon­si­ble for this.

    Re Modi: He being at the helm in 2002 would have had some infor­ma­tion on the trou­ble that was about to take place at Godhra. That is the burn­ing of coaches with the Hindu work­ers inside.
    And if he was not aware of the sub­se­quent killings, then he is not fit to even be the CM of Guarat, leave alone PM of the Coun­try. He too should have resigned and repented.
    Like some­one said. It is bet­ter to have a .… like Rahul become the PM, than to have some­one with blood on his hands.

  • Surendra Shah wrote:

    Bhavin (aka MFM):

    Naren­dra Modi will always carry the bur­den of what hap­pened in Godhra what­ever his polit­i­cal jour­ney. But it will be bal­anced with his achieve­ments in eco­nomic growth of Gujarat.

    There is no right job descrip­tion for a PM. One thing is for sure, a coun­try can­not be run as a cor­po­ra­tion because Cor­po­rate CEO’s are focused on costs and effi­cien­cies. In that con­text, the have not will never be a priority.

    Modi seems to have best cre­den­tials from expe­ri­ence point of view. Vot­ers like all of you have have to eval­u­ate his vision for the coun­try for the ben­e­fit of all includ­ing those who can­not afford one square meal a day.

    Look­ing from the out­side (a res­i­dent of US), India needs a sound energy pol­icy to main­tain tar­get eco­nomic growth. One of Modi’s eco­nomic objec­tives is focused on suf­fi­ciency of power for the coun­try which can do much more than what cell phones and bot­tled water has done for India.

  • I don’t know the facts of the case. And I don’t know if Modi is guilty, par­tially guilty, par­tially inno­cent or com­pletely inno­cent. I do know that the mere shred of doubt over his role in the Godhra riots poses a few, very impor­tant ques­tions: Can we let such a man exert power and con­trol over our lives? What mes­sage are we send­ing other, unlaw­ful cit­i­zens who take the law in their own hands? If Modi is guilty – and the rea­son we don’t know for sure is that in India, you’re inno­cent until proven guilty – can we pos­si­bly let him take respon­si­bil­ity for a whole country?

    Yes, ‘shit hap­pens and peo­ple make mis­takes’, but for you to dis­miss 2002 as merely ‘shit’ pays it huge dis­re­spect, and frankly, I’m amazed you said some­thing so flip­pant. Besides, peo­ple who realise that they’ve made mis­takes let them­selves be held account­able and pay the price for their errors. I don’t think build­ing Gujarat to what it is today really counts as mak­ing amends.

    I don’t care who our next PM is; I only know that it mustn’t be Modi.

  • […] thought only actors got type­cast! After last week’s piece “The Namoral Dilemma”, I received emails, SMSes, blog com­ments and calls ask­ing why I had writ­ten a political […]

  • Chirag Maniyar wrote:

    I just want to say that media has always given neg­a­tive impact to peo­ple for Mr. Modi

    Just check out all the posts of Times of India (they claim to be the NUMBER ONE Eng­lish news­pa­per of India) con­cerned with either NDA (and specif­i­cally Mr. Modi) or the stu­pid dynas­tic party. They always por­tray Mr. Modi in bad light and treat their dar­ling Rahul baba as the FUTURE of India.
    If Rahul baba is the future of India, then India is def­i­nitely mov­ing back­wards in all the fronts.
    TOI never ever appre­ci­ates or high­lights tons and tons of work done by Mr. Modi, but one morsel of food eaten by Rahul baba in a poor man’s house is made the NEWS of the Day as if he blessed the fam­ily by eat­ing their food. This dif­fer­ence of atti­tude towards Mr. Modi or the BJP by TOI is not healthy and impacts peo­ple towards being neg­a­tive for him.
    And as far as the dumb sec­u­lar­ist party is con­cerned, just see how happy and sat­is­fied peo­ple are in Mr. Modi’s reign (yes, even Mus­lims in Gujarat say that). It show­cases his power as a LEADER and that’s what sep­a­rates him from the HERD of POLITICIANS. I have HUGE RESPECT for him and it is Time that all real­ize what is the need of the hour for India. Or else, we’ll burn in hell by bring­ing back the CORRUPT sec­u­lar­ist party in power, and will have to face more and more prob­lems. Rise prices, increased rate of unem­ploy­ment, upward trend­ing crimes are enough of the warn­ing signs for peo­ple to under­stand that they are not ben­e­fited by the cor­rupt rul­ing party. I humbly REQUEST you Mr. BHAVIN JANKARIA, if you are read­ing this piece of com­ment, please let peo­ple know this. I am very very glad you wrote some­thing on Mr. Modi. I totally under­stand that peo­ple ARE CONFUSED on Mr. Naren­dra Modi but I think HE IS THE MAN INDIA NEEDS TODAY.

  • Dear Bhavin,

    The com­ments on this piece warm the heart more than your piece. The com­ments here make me believe that good sense may still prevail.

    I agree with Deepa Krishnan’s com­ment above.

    I don’t think you are advo­cat­ing for­give­ness for modi but here is what I feel about that kind of forgiveness.

    For­give­ness is a good thing. As is for­get­ting. If you sub­scribe to a cer­tain type of thought.

    While we’re for­giv­ing, let’s for­give afzal guru as well? Wait we can’t. We just hanged him.
    Let’s for­give ajmal kasab too. Wait, we hanged him too.
    Let’s for­give osama bin laden. Wait, we got him too.
    What about for­giv­ing sunil more, the con­sta­ble who raped that 17 year old girl at the Marine Drive police chowky?
    What about for­giv­ing the 6 rapists who killed that poor phys­io­ther­a­pist girl recently?

    Let’s for­give hitler, idi emin, gaddafi, sad­dam and assad while he’s still at it.
    Let’s for­give stalin. And those who per­pe­trated the Tianan­men Square mas­sacre.
    Let’s for­give prab­hakaran, veer­ap­pan, gen­eral dyer.

    Why stop at modi?

    Sec­ondly, you make a bold but inac­cu­rate claim when you state that modi is “the best PM can­di­date that we have”.
    What is this con­clu­sion that you have come to based on?

    modi’s devel­op­ment story is more PR & less devel­op­ment. his lies are being exposed one after the other. The MoU’s signed and adver­tised at the Vibrant Gujarat’s sum­mits do not mate­ri­alise. Maharashtra’s invest­ments far out­strip Gujarat’s. Maha­rash­tra isn’t PR savvy because it isn’t using the PR like the “per­fumes of Arabia”.

    Gujarat is now behind GDP growth as well. Maha­rash­tra, Bihar, CG are all ahead.

    RTI activists are a frus­trated lot in modi’s Gujarat.

    Alco­hol is still boot­legged openly under modi.

    There’s a list of scams that runs well over 17,000 crore!

    modi’s gov­er­nance has a track record of sec­tar­ian vio­lence, mur­der, rape, may­hem, of high hand­ed­ness, cor­rup­tion, megalomania.

    How do you see such a man fit for any pub­lic office, let alone the high­est one in the nation?

  • Vikram Vepa wrote:

    It is very heart­en­ing to see this rag­ing debate on whether NaMo is a suit­able can­di­date for the PM’s post or not. I am sure Bhavin did not expect such an out­pour­ing of voices! I tend to agree with Bhavin that my feel­ings are ambiva­lent on the sub­ject. Show me one leader, any­where in the world, who has not done some­thing that he/she regrets later? It is nice to see a hand­ful of peo­ple vocif­er­ously express their opin­ions, and believe they are speak­ing on behalf of the coun­try! to bor­row a phrase from Bhavin, “shit hap­pens”! have we for­got­ten that in a democ­racy such as ours, it’s the party that cap­tures the most bal­lot booths wins? Not what you and I say, because we don’t even care to cast our vote. Yet, we want to decide who the next PM of our coun­try is..don’t make me laugh!

    If there is a per­son who is will­ing to take on the bou­quets and brick­bats, usu­ally more of the lat­ter I am afraid, of run­ning this coun­try, let him go to the peo­ple and ask for their man­date. This morn­ing I read that Mayawati has thrown her hat into the ring too. The list of hope­fuls is as long as my arm. Yet, there can be only PM. Who gets there is not always a ques­tion of who deserves to be there.

    All I say is that to all these peo­ple who are will­ing to pass opin­ion, why dont you put your words into action..go bat­tle it out in the mine­field that is Indian pol­i­tics, see how far you reach with your lofty ideals? Get down and face real­ity, your ivory tow­ers will not last forever.

  • Chirag Maniyar wrote:

    Aman,

    As far as the so-called Modi’s PR is con­cerned, it was a neces­sity for Mr. Modi to do it; because the paid media does not present any­thing neu­trally and never high­lights pros of Modi govt. So he had to take this mat­ter into his hands to let peo­ple know about what a fan­tas­tic job his govt is doing; be it indus­trial, energy (in par­tic­u­lar solar power), agri­cul­ture, food­grains and prod­uct man­u­fac­tur­ing, edu­ca­tion, employ­ment and well-being of peo­ple.
    Even world bank agrees not once, but twice to this MAN.

    http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010–08-24/ahmedabad/28273169_1_road-network-highway-sector-km

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/BusinessBankingInsurance/World-Bank-says-follow-Gujarat/Article1-744837.aspx

    Just visit his offi­cial Face­book page for once and see the posts that will make you realise what you are miss­ing. Do LIKE it so that you get to see reg­u­lar posts.

    Agreed the GDP of gujarat is not as swanky as Maha­rash­tra. The rea­son is that major­ity share of Maharashtra’s pie are from Mum­bai, THE BUSINESS CAPITAL OF INDIA. Oth­er­wise the rest of Mah. is as good as noth­ing (Pune is though becom­ing bet­ter by the day, no doubt).

    Regard­ing the state­ment of scams OVER Rs. 17000 crores, all of these are yet base­less. Even if they are proven, money that may have been bribed is show­ing its effects because WORK IS HAPPENING, not just money eaten up and not even Bur­rped like our lazy cen­tral govt. Let me just show you the SOME insights of OUR HONEST CENTRAL GOVERNMENT:

    Rs 185,591 crore Coal min­ing scam.
    Rs 176,000 crore (Rs 1.76 tril­lion) 2G spec­trum allo­ca­tion scam.
    Rs. 166,972 crore Delhi Intl Air­port Ltd. Scam
    Rs 70,000 crore famous CWG scam
    Rs 35,000 crore UP food grain scam Mayawati, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Kapil Sib­bal main accused
    Rs. 16,000 Crore of gran­ite scam alone in Tamil Nadu
    Rs 3,600 crore of the recent chop­per scam
    Rs 1000 crore PDS scam in Arunachal Pradesh
    Rs 500 crore Scor­pene deal scam
    Rs 175 crore taj cor­ri­dor scam
    Rs 70 crore National High­way scam
    madhu koda min­ing scam, ura­nium scam, bofors sacam, this scam that scam can you just imag­ine these vari­eties pro­vided?
    All these sum upto more then 1000 times of what is sup­pos­edly your quoted amount of 17000 crores. And mind it, even 0.0001 per­cent of this money has not been returned back to the com­mon man in any par­tic­u­lar way. It is sim­ply dumped in swiss banks and is used to stuff into faces of peo­ple who oppose the Mum­myji or her dar­ling baba. At least you should appre­ci­ate the fact that the Gujarat govt works its part to that level.

    And yes, the list goes on and on and on for the United Pro­gres­sive Alliance. They believe in ally­ing unit­edly for their own progress.

    I heard some­thing called rape, vio­lence, may­hem, cor­rup­tion some­where. Sheila dixit, are you lis­ten­ing? Some­one pls also call Shri Sharad­chan­draji Pawar saheb, shri Ashok Cha­van, Shri Pra­ful Patel, Shri Laloo Prasad Yadav so that we can gar­land them on their effi­cient work­ing for our country.

    Psst… The last whole para­graph was sar­casm. Dont take it seri­ously, nei­ther of our UPA guys take India seriously.

    Lastly, I want to rec­ol­lect the infa­mous Man­mo­han singh dia­logue mad on sept 14, 2012,“We have to bite the bul­let, if we have to go down, let us go down fight­ing”. Do lead­ers talk THIS SHIT to pub­lic? Com­pare this to the speeches that Mr. Naren­dra Modi gives. Just search for him on youtube. You will find hun­dreds of the speeches. #THEEK HAI?

  • Chirag Maniyar wrote:

    Mr. Bhavin, if you read this piece, please do share your insights on my point of view. The bot­tom line of my dis­cus­sion (or argu­ment if You are read­ing Mr Aman or Ms Dalzeen).
    And yes, I did for­get com­pletely of our ex-President Mrs. Prat­i­bha tai Patil. What a bril­liant usage of her posi­tion…!!!
    Some­one who can spend Rs 205 crore pub­lic money for per­sonal trips is def­i­nitely fit for being the first cit­i­zen of India, right Aman? Because Mr. Naren­dra Modi, the son of the soil, the Man who knows his busi­ness does not deserve Prime Min­is­ter ship, but our rahul baba knows per­fectly. How beau­ti­fully and single-handedly, he dipped the UPA chances in the UP elections.!

    And on a com­pletely dif­fer­ent note, please dont respect guys like Akbarud­din Owaisi, their lan­guage speaks more of their atti­tude towards peo­ple. Mr. Modi is umpteen times bet­ter than the dan­ger­ous Mr. Owaisi.

  • I’m sur­prised that leader of a gov­ern­ment which failed to pro­tect its cit­i­zens and main­tain law and order not once but many times is voted again and again back to power. Gujrat gov­ern­ment in 2002 failed on many accounts:
    1. Failed to iden­tify that trou­ble is brew­ing in Godhra; fail­ure of intel­li­gence ser­vices.
    2. Failed to act in time to saves lives in Godhra train burn­ing; fail­ure of Emergecny ser­vices and police force.
    3. Failed again to pro­tect inno­cent lives of peo­ple who did not have any­thing to do with train burn­ing but just hap­pened to have sim­i­lar reli­gious faith.
    One act of vio­lence revenged by another more grue­some vio­lence was how prim­i­tive bar­baric soci­eties behaved.
    Mod­ern civ­i­lized states would inves­ti­gate in depth how and by whom the vio­lence was per­pe­trated and bring all the cul­prits before jus­tice.
    It is obnox­ious and out­right stu­pid that a man who failed to pre­vent, if not over­saw, all these mind­less vio­lence is now pur­ported to be the head of the coun­try. Seems India has long way to go before it gets the pri­or­i­ties right.

  • Chirag Maniyar wrote:

    Thiru­vanan­tha­pu­ram, Mar 8: An MLA of the Indian Union Mus­lim League (IUML) that is part of the Congress-led UDF gov­ern­ment in Ker­ala has absolved Gujarat Chief Min­is­ter Naren­dra Modi of any blame what­so­ever in the post-Godhra riots. Address­ing a IUML meet­ing at Panoor in Ker­ala on Wednes­day, the leg­is­la­tor KM Shaji said that Modi has not tried to imple­ment the BJP’s Hin­dutva agenda in Gujarat.

    Accord­ing to Shaji, Modi can­not be held guilty of killing Mus­lims. Nor did he have a role to play in the destruc­tion of any masjid, Shaji averred. Point­ing to the har­mony between Gujarati Mus­lims and Hin­dus, he said that mem­bers of the minor­ity com­mu­nity have wel­comed Modi’s good governance.

    Gujarat has wit­nessed rapid devel­op­ment over the past one decade and the steps taken by the BJP regime should be emu­lated by other states in order to achieve sim­i­lar growth, the MLA stressed.

    Inci­den­tally, sev­eral IUML lead­ers were present on the dias while Shaji gave a clean chit to Modi but none of them objected to his praise of a polit­i­cal rival. The sur­pris­ing aspect is that IUML never misses a chance to tar­get the BJP.

    This speaks vol­umes of THE MAN.
    T Rehman, wake up

  • Binu Varghese wrote:

    Actu­ally we are not so both­ered about Maren­dra Modi, not as much as the BJP lead­ers are inter­nally and the Media is. Modi is just a decent admin­is­tra­tor and arro­gant, unfor­giv­ing ruler. He will be a dis­as­ter to the Coun­try if he comes any­where near Delhi. What’s wrong with Rahul Gandhi? As qual­i­fied. And there are oth­ers. NaMo does not even regret what hapenned at that time. Oh Come on Man, i a hope India is sen­si­ble enough to crush your Ego, your Rude­ness, your arrogance.…

  • Chirag Maniyar wrote:

    Mr Binu Vargh­ese, please rush to any near­est coach­ing insti­tute that spe­cial­izes in teach­ing Eng­lish lan­guage, its gram­mar, nouns, pro­nouns, proper nouns and stuff.

    Okay, first of all, it is any­thing but ‘Maren­dra’ Modi.
    Noth­ing that “hapenned”(as per your Eng­lish) is to be regret­ted. U “a” hope India is sen­si­ble to NOT vote Con­gress and its allies because the UPA leeches will only suck more and more money from us and will be no good to pro­vide edu­ca­tion, secu­rity, admin­is­tra­tion that India needs.
    You are ask­ing “What’s wrong with Rahul Gandhi?” Well, Mr Binu, you seem to be suf­fer­ing not only from Eng­lish lan­guage prob­lems but also men­tal prob­lems.
    Check out this web­site: http://rahulgandhiachievements.com/
    which gives us a com­piled and proper look of the things done by Mr Rahul Gandhi.

    IS it not in front of your eyes how the UPA govt has screwed us all in the last decade that you want to again bang your head on the wall?
    Why don’t you guys under­stand that the exer­cis­ing of vote is to decide who will func­tion the Indian gov­ern­ment in an effi­cient way till the grass root level.
    Open your eyes and see what is hap­Pen­ning…
    It is not about Hin­duism, islam, Sikhism, Jain­ism, chris­tian­ity, Bud­dhism, Zoroastrianism,Judaism or any other reli­gion. It is about being a human; an Indian. A per­son like Mr Modi knows his work. Not like our eunuch govt who unable to admin­is­trate gov­er­nance in the coun­try.
    Enough said.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *