Show Business Activism

You are dreaming!

You are a 40-something suc­cess­ful super­star, struck with middle-age angst, aching to do some­thing dif­fer­ent and socially rel­e­vant. You flirt with the likes of the Nar­mada project and Anna Haz­are but they turn out to be too controversial.

Then you real­ize that it’s best to do some­thing within the con­text of your pro­fes­sion and kill three birds with one stone; do some­thing dif­fer­ent, make good money and not waste time learn­ing new “third things” like run­ning or paragliding.

You start brain­storm­ing and come up with the idea of doing a show that high­lights socially rel­e­vant issues. You start with an episode on female feti­cide that cre­ates such a storm in the coun­try that a cou­ple of Chief Min­is­ters actu­ally give you an audi­ence. You are thrilled and start believ­ing that you are at the cusp of a new movement.

Other episodes fol­low in a sim­i­lar vein. You choose safe one-sided top­ics that don’t allow counter-arguments. Obvi­ously, female feti­cide is unac­cept­able, as are child rape, domes­tic vio­lence and the prac­tice of dowry. Not hav­ing another view­point or rea­soned debate allows a tightly scripted show, with the right amount of short sound-bytes, keyed down histri­on­ics and misty eyes.

You smartly choose soft tar­gets; peo­ple who can’t really fight back or make your life mis­er­able, steer­ing clear of politi­cians, pow­er­ful indus­tri­al­ists and busi­ness­men and peo­ple related to the under­world or the dif­fer­ent mafias. To back you up, you use a “research” team that keeps pass­ing off small sam­ple dip­stick sur­veys as research or uses mate­r­ial that is already in the pub­lic domain.

You are cruis­ing away hap­pily on cloud nine…when suddenly…you stum­ble. You anchor an episode on the state of health­care. It is true that com­mis­sions, over-prescription of drugs and unnec­es­sary surg­eries are all major prob­lems that need to be tack­led. But in your new­found glory and power, you for­get to double-check your facts and use exam­ples that are ridicu­lous, wrong or down­right untruths. More impor­tantly, the case stud­ies you show have a sec­ond side to their sto­ries that don’t get told…you for­get that med­i­cine is still a prac­tice of judg­ment calls that requires both sides to be heard to get to the truth that may still at the end not be clearly obvi­ous. And worse, you actu­ally, unthink­ingly, make stu­pid, flip­pant state­ments that cre­ate havoc in the minds of patients (for exam­ple, those with renal fail­ure) that make most doc­tors like me cringe.

And soon there­after, peo­ple start tun­ing out and the TRPs take a tum­ble. The show, like this arti­cle, seems too good to be true. The histrionics…the tears, the raised eye­brows, the tilted head…all become repet­i­tive and pre­dictable. In fact, Jha­lak Dikhla Ja and Indian Idol seem to pro­vide more hon­est enter­tain­ment as real­ity shows go… with­out all the “socially rel­e­vant” bag­gage. In jour­nal­ist Sucheta Dalal’s words, “if activism could be reduced to show busi­ness, India would not need dras­tic trans­for­ma­tion, 65 years after inde­pen­dence”.

And then you wake up, cold!

You begin to real­ize that show-business activism is no dif­fer­ent from the arm­chair, one-click activism that has become the norm these days in the era of email, Face­book and Twit­ter, which, as Mr. Mal­colm Glad­well has dis­cussed in one of his long-form arti­cles in The New Yorker, is unlikely to bring in any last­ing change in the long term! You also intu­itively under­stand that mak­ing a dif­fer­ence in real life means get­ting your hands dirty in the mud and that rea­soned dis­course means hav­ing to han­dle a 360 degrees view of the prob­lem with bal­anc­ing counter-views.

You shake your head. What a dream!

35 Comments

  • shefali wrote:

    awe­some.…. you have put in words what was in my mind since the first day of air­ing… BTW i have not watched a sin­gle episode…

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    You should watch a cou­ple She­fali. In terms of pro­duc­tion val­ues the show is very nice.

  • Every one is enti­tled to an opin­ion.
    You may like Jha­lak dikhlaja and Indian Idol for its enter­tain­ment value which they are, but Satyameva Jay­ate does not pro­pogate enter­tain­ment.
    It tru­ely takes us to the per­sonal lives of the com­mon man and tells us about some things many of us were unaware of.
    Did you see the last episode about pes­ti­cides in our food. He had brought in the CEO of largest pes­ti­cide man­u­fac­turer on the dias to give a 360 degree view to the topic of tox­i­c­ity in food products.

    Every episode I have seen has brought a lump to my throat.
    It shakes me up from my cal­lous atti­tude towards life and makes me want to do reach out and do some­thing to help in a small way I can. The ser­ial make one think about all the top­ics touched upon so far.
    I don’t know about TRP rat­ings, but this ser­ial is on the top of my favorite pro­gram ‘must list’ to watch.
    After watch­ing every episode of the said servial so far on Sun­days, other ser­ial look pale in com­par­i­son. Sorry, they aren’t even any where close to be com­pared.
    I look for­ward to this weekly dose of awak­en­ing the uncon­sious part(consceince) of my mind.

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    I have stopped watch­ing so I wouldn’t know about the pes­ti­cide one but it is not in their inter­est to have con­flict­ing opin­ions. The idea is that the the view­ers should not be allowed to think and decide on their own — one point of view, that of the show should be thrust down their throat.

  • Janak Sheth wrote:

    I have not seen that episode on Med­ical Prac­tise. Let us tem­porar­ily cast aside the issue of poor research or one side story. Lets look at the broader ques­tion of trust (i.e. cor­rup­tion related) in the med­ical fraternity.

    The endemic cor­rupt prac­tices of the med­ical fra­ter­nity raise doubt in every citizen’s mind as to the doctor’s motives. Is it not time that the fra­ter­nity did some­thing about it. Sadly guid­ing trust­wor­thy GPs are dying breed (you wrote about this few months ago).

    Would female feoti­cide be so preva­lent if the med­ical frater­n­tiy did not actively con­nive with the soci­ety. Then is the med­ical fra­ter­nity not guilty? Is this judi­cious use of their med­ical knowledge?

    I can under­stand that you as part of the med­ical fra­ter­nity are espe­cially touchy about that sub­ject but step back, take an objec­tive view and look at how the wrong can be righted.

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    No one is deny­ing Janak, the prob­lems. Just that the exam­ples shown should have aired a sec­ond point of view.

  • shaukat dyani wrote:

    i would like o reply to janak. the author has not defended the med­ical practice/ners or the pro­fes­sion nor has he crit­i­cized the 40+ acting-crusader per se. he has just rightly pointed out that a gen­uine coin has 2 sides. some­times suc­cess in one field goes to the head GOD PROMISE one feels like god.

  • Haniraj Chulani wrote:

    Much as the pub­lic expect doc­tors to be cor­rup­tion free it is to be remem­bered that they come from the same pool as other pro­fes­sion­als. A cor­rupt archi­tect could maim or kill hun­dreds at one go and a cor­rupt lawyer can screw his client to deprive him of his due.
    About the show of Aamir Khan– it was total bull s***. A patient under­went pan­cre­atic trans­plant when he was admit­ted for a kid­ney dis­ease! Only a fool can believe that. But then, peo­ple gen­er­ally are stu­pid and lap up things read, heard or shown on the big/small screen!
    You don’t need to cringe– carry on the good work.

  • Nitin tamhane wrote:

    So very true .You have taken the phony show head on .How­ever after all it is a TV show with TRP and all noth­ing more noth­ing less.Has any­one claimed includ­ing Aamir that they want to change any­thing through the program?

    With active news cam­paign­ers around these shows are irrelevant

    The real star is Arnab who takes the politicians,industrialists and mafia head on with­out fear

    The old lady of Bori­bun­der is behind him !

  • dipali wrote:

    There is a jour­nal­ist whose col­umn I like,and some­times send him an email.he wrote about the pos­i­tiv­ity of this show a cou­ple of weeks back.when I wrote to him my feel­ings about the episode on med­ical practise,(which are sim­i­lar to dr.bhavin’s as I too am a medico)he became defen­sive and did­not take it too well.My point is,why has there not been a sin­gle episode or com­ment about cor­rupt politicians,police department,cricketers etc.Serving the human­ity is the duty of every human being and not just doctors.Bollywood stars,cricketers,and some high pro­file indus­tri­al­ists never even think of serv­ing the humanity.Well,there are still some episodes left,so let us see whether the anchor has the guts to expose cor­rup­tion in these fields.I have no inten­tion to defend a mal­prac­tis­ing doctor,but the point is,he has cho­sen doc­tors to “expose“them,as he is not wor­ried about the back­lash like there was at the time of Nar­mada controversy.

  • Amit Choudhury wrote:

    Most Indi­ans live in a ster­ile cocoon which revolves round family,food and films.The fact that Amir has made a well scripted,intelligent and watch­able series based on real issues, which if not any­thing else pro­vokes thought, makes some of us uncom­fort­able. In spite of Bhav­inbhais sar­casm the fact that some action is finally being taken against abor­tion clin­ics and peo­ple know there are options in med­ica­tions and pes­ti­cide free pro­duce etc. is enough for me.But then the aver­age man from Matunga would rather learn the lat­est Bol­ly­wood steps from TV for the next Navratri

  • jamnav wrote:

    Dear Bhavin
    I do wish, in the med­ical episode more atten­tion was given to Dr.Shetty. Yes, there is mal­prac­tice and fairly wide­spread, but there are so many physi­cians who really care for the patients and often forgo their fees if the patient can not afford it.
    Jamna

  • JIGISH B MODI wrote:

    I would like to reply to Janak. Every pro­fes­sion has got rot­ten eggs. But to blame the entire fra­ter­nity because of this is not cor­rect. Also the research which was shown lacks good home­work (rather research work)I am a non-medico but have com­ment sense.. which is lack­ing in that episode.

    When you have a prob­lem, dont you take two three opin­ions? How can one believe what was shown in that episode. This was tar­geted to mass media of our coun­try, who believe that what actu­ally has been shown is true. This sounded like the unbear­able Hindi news of chan­nel which shows rub­bish and to make it enter­tain­ing they add much sound and music like India TV Lemon TV etc. which lacks sub­stance and adds crap to Idiot Box. Good Masala for one evening !!

  • and this is how a good move­ment gets snipped in the bud.… granted that there may be a slight bit of one sid­ed­ness but over­all the show is shift­ing the focus to things we still need to fix. We can­not con­tinue liv­ing in our “India shin­ing” while the India still in dark­ness spi­rals ever more into darkness.

    Tomor­row this writeup will get pub­lished in Mum­bai Mir­ror and a nation of crabs will have a chem­i­cal reac­tion and start pooh poohing the reformer who was try­ing to get them to give up female infan­ti­cide, wife beat­ing, dowry, child abuse.… and a fairly large amount of med­ical mal­prac­tice as well.… granted you are a med­ical pro­fes­sional good sir but you are also a much read intel­lec­tual thinker. Peo­ple form opin­ions on what you write here. With great power comes greater respon­si­bil­ity and today of all days I feel a writer who is much read has a huge impact on the pub­lic opinion.

    So the show said some­thing bad about the med­ical pro­fes­sion, every­one sat up and took notice, but the great work being done by Dr. Shetty which was equally high­lighted …why was that not as cel­e­brated by the med­ical fra­ter­nity? why did the fra­ter­nity not go “yes!!! this is what we do, this is dotors for you!!!”.… because lets face it even you know that a mul­ti­spe­cial­ity hos­pi­tal is not built on char­ity alone… and when busi­ness creeps into the noble pro­fes­sion, cor­rup­tion can­not and is not far behind. Does an x-ray have to cost as much as it does? does a USG need to cost upwards of 2000 bucks?

    Seri­ously what and who are we fool­ing, there is a busi­ness ele­ment in the med­ical pro­fes­sion and the asso­ci­ated cor­rup­tion today is higher than ever before, thanks to MRs and insur­ance com­pa­nies. Then again can’t blame you for the defen­sive arti­cle after all it’s noth­ing per­sonal… just busi­ness as usual.… only that this destroys a move­ment tomor­row morn­ing when the 6:23 local pulls out of And­heri sta­tion and opin­ions start form­ing.… wife beat­ing, child molesta­tion, female infati­cide and med­ical mal­prac­tices are all back on the table.… congratulations!

  • V.Subramanian wrote:

    Your Arti­cle does betray a sense of deep hurt.One can under­stand wherre your are com­ing from. Politicians,Businessmen and Under­world guys do not affect the lives of com­mon man,on a reg­u­lar basis, as much as a Doc­tor does.Besides it is not a ques­tion of an odd “Black Sheep” here or there, but there are sev­eral of them and Doc­tors like Devi Shetty are rare exceptions.My Profession(CA) is also much maligned one.But the mal­pactri­ces of a CA does not affect directly a com­mon man’s life.It is easy to pon­tif­i­cate that there is no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for mal­par­ac­tices, any where.But Prac­tice of med­i­cine, calls for the high­est level of ethicl stan­dards.
    Let us not shoot the mes­sen­ger and refuse to accept reality.Counter view points,especially con­cern­ing this episode,would be in a bare minor­ity, drowned in a del­uge of of those who agree with Amir Khan.One can nit pick on the man­ner in which he con­ducted the programme,but the con­tents seem irrefutable. Activism through any medium should be accept­able in a pro­gres­sive democ­racy as long as it pro­duces the desired impact.I do agree, it is dif­fi­cult to judge weather the san­ti­mo­nius exhi­bi­tions dis­played in pub­lic through his shows, is per­son­aly prac­tised or not.

  • I have not watched that con­tro­ver­sial episode but all I can say is that there is no smoke with­out fire. It may be lop sided to an extent but surely not all that is being said is false. Pharma cos do play with lives and they do it through doc­tors. There may be few and far cases but can’t say that the med­ical fra­ter­nity is above board com­pletely. I am no judge for the show or for doc­tors but I strongly believe that yes there are mal­prac­tices and under­hand deal­ings. Hav­ing said that I am not advo­cat­ing that this show is the best or such but it has opened a can of worms which was hith­erto swept under the carpet.

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    Manish…all that is a given. There are a lot of issues with med­ical prac­tice. But that does not give any­one the right to use down­right wrong exam­ples. The ends don’t jus­tify the means.

  • Jayesh Desai wrote:

    All those who point fin­ger at oth­ers should remem­ber that three fin­gers point towards them, Doc­tors do not drop from heaven, They are born, brought up in this same cess-pool which now India has become. Kindly remem­ber that a per­son who by the time he becomes doc­tor see this around him every­where, and what should be excep­tion has becomes norm, so his moral fiber has already com­pro­mised. How­ever this is not to defend the doc­tors. I would like to tell the CA friend that betrayal of trust by any­one is heinous crime against human­ity. Any­one who does that has to be denounced strongly. Can you tell me how many peo­ple who buy flat in Mum­bai cost­ing more then crors of Rupees have earned that money hon­estly? so go home and look in mir­ror and try to reform that per­son first.(applies to Amir too)

  • Jayesh Desai wrote:

    All those who point fin­ger at oth­ers should remem­ber that three fin­gers point towards them, Doc­tors do not drop from heaven, They are born, brought up in this same cess-pool which now India has become. Kindly remem­ber that a per­son who by the time he becomes doc­tor see this around him every­where, and what should be excep­tion has becomes norm, so his moral fiber has already com­pro­mised. How­ever this is not to defend the doc­tors. I would like to tell the CA friend that betrayal of trust by any­one is heinous crime against human­ity. Any­one who does that has to be denounced strongly. Can you tell me how many peo­ple who buy flat in Mum­bai cost­ing more then crors of Rupees have earned that money hon­estly? so go home and look in mir­ror and try to reform that per­son first.(applies to Amir too)

  • Sunil Kamath wrote:

    The Very Fact that, this col­umn of yours Bhavin(ji) has elicited so many com­ments, sug­gests that this indeed is a DEBATABLE TOPIC.

    Being a Retd. Pathol­o­gist myself, can vouch for the fact that, MALPRACTICES ARE RAMPANT.…and WE DO NOT DENY THE FACT…but at the same time would have pre­ferred AAMIR to hold his show in a much bal­anced form.

    When the Star goes on to cite exam­ple of the no. of Doc­tors sus­pended in the UK and in India…would it not have been pru­dent on his part to also com­ment and high­light the no. of times that the Doc­tors have been beaten and bod­ily harmed, vis a vis the Doc­tors in the UK. Also would it not been fair to com­pare the facil­i­ties & the infra­struc­ture that the Doc­tors from the 2 coun­tries encounter, as stu­dents and Med­ical Professionals ???

    When Aamir show­cased Dr. Devi Shetty (and may his Tribe Grow) let it be known that for every Aamir Khan there are a count­less no. of strug­glers (in Bollywood).

    One of the com­ments, men­tioned the ENDEMIC CORRUPT PRACTICES of the Med­ical Fraternity…Would the Gen­tle­man who used such glow­ing terms, point out to us.…ONE PROFESSION that is FREE OF … such ENDEMIC CORRUPT PRACTICES ???

    What this show by the SUPERSTAR has man­aged to do is that a lot of cyn­i­cism will be spread amongst the Gen­eral pub­lic as they view the Doc­tors and the Health­care sys­tem, which PREVIOUSLY TOO, WAS SEEN THROUGH JAUNDICED EYES..!!

    Aamir Khan was con­sid­ered to be the ONLY THINKING ACTOR in Bol­ly­wood after the BIG B himself…but this episode has left many more like me ques­tion­ing that fact..!!

  • Your Reply ” The idea is that the the view­ers should not be allowed to think and decide on their own — one point of view, that of the show should be thrust down their throat.”

    Nobody is thrust­ing any­thing down anybody’s throat. You excer­cised your right to not watch­ing the ser­ial. You have right to switch and watch seri­als like Jha­lak Dhik­laja or Indian Idol which make you “think?”. These are the very shows which thrust down our throat what they want to show, there’s noth­ing to think.

    Aamir’s ser­ial is inter­ac­tive, thought pro­vok­ing, has social mes­sage which makes the audi­ence and viewer sit up and think and act for them­selves, rather than ” Chalta hai ” atti­tude or ” Kuch nahi hona is desh ka”. He has shown that how even com­man peo­ple like us can stand up and fight the sys­tem and come out with fly­ing col­ors. He is just try­ing to tell us ” to be the change we want to see.”

    Give the guy a chance this Sun­day morn­ing. See it with an unbi­ased mind.
    I am sure you will see the pro­gramme in a dif­fer­ent light. The ser­ial has never pro­moted itself as an enter­tain­ment pro­gram. For that you have the other shows you mentioned.

    By the way, the dreamer atleast voiced his opin­ion on Nar­mada and Anna. Some of us did not even do that though we all had an opinion.

  • DR.RUPAL SHAH wrote:

    HI,
    SORRY IF I HAVE MISSED IT BUT
    WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT GIVING COMMISSIONS TO REFERRING DOCTORS ( THECUT PRACTICE’)…WHICH IS A PRACTICE, DO YOU AGREE?

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    I agree Rupal. It needs to be addressed and tackled.

  • prem mahtani wrote:

    Will Aamir broach the topic of ”POPULATION CONTROL”,this is one and sin­gle fac­tor thaqt has ruined our nation.
    A cou­ple who has no roof,no food,no clothes
    get upon them­selves to pro­duce kids like there was no tomorrow,these kids roam the streets cre­at­ing slums and pro­duc­ing more kids,eating into our econ­omy where less than 2% pay taxes and the rest screw the tax payer to pay more for infrastructure.At the rate we are going there is enough chaos and future is not india shining,it is a bull­shit pro­poganda by politi­cians who are voted to power by slums.Aamir is a actor who gets paid,but let him come out with episodes on some ”CIVIC SENSE”,”ROAD SENSE IN TERMS OF DRIVING AND JAYWALKINGAND ABOVE ALLPOPULATION EXPLOSION.

  • Bhavik, I agree with you. There are shows that are being Thrust-down our throats. Spe­cially, all the Ladies Spe­cial Shows from 10 am to 12 pm mid­night. I won­der who is gain­ing — knowledge-wise or oth­er­wise from such shows, except pro­mot­ers and adver­tis­ers. My head starts spin­ning even while just glanc­ing at such shows and scarred of los­ing bal­ance the man­ner in which they are shown. Only the ladies pre­vail in these shows and when­ever any male mem­ber comes up — whether son / son-in-law / father / father-in-law / grand father / grand father-in-law, they are all shown stand­ing on one side hav­ing meek pres­ence as if afraid to open their mouth or mind. Are they try­ing to cre­ate a new cul­ture in our India fam­ily sys­tem? Then I think they are liv­ing in fool’s paradise.

  • About Amir Khan’s shows, he has done a good begin­ning, but there are many issues affect­ing lives of us Indian on day-to-day basis, which he should take-up, instead of just dwelling on any one sub­ject. With his pop­u­lar­ity and grip on audi­ence, he would be able to do it mar­velously if he takes one such issue at a time per episode. He could bring about a lot of aware­ness to our peo­ple which is badly needed, pro­vided he selects and man­ages such issues on screen with care — and No Doubt, he has the exper­tise to do it. So should put it in use for the masses.

  • The rea­son that doc­tors are angry with the show is that the show prides itself to be the bea­con of truth but didn’t bother to give the doc­tors a fair chance to put their case
    . The actual sto­ries in the show are half truths as most doc­tors involved have come forth with their side with proof on forums like Face­book. Instead of admit­ting his mis­take aamir khan has ranted on with his non sense on news channels.

    Besides all top­ics from the show are shown on most news chan­nels every­day. Nobody both­ered then. So if peo­ple are tak­ing the top­ics seri­ously it is just becoz of bol­ly­wood fac­tor ..As you have aptly put show biz activism. Fake.

  • kalpana.sridharan wrote:

    Dear Mr.Bhavin,felt very sad to read your arti­cle on med­ical malpractice.we always knew neg­a­tive side of med­ical­prac­tice but let me tell you after watch­ing the show i came to know about remark­able job done by doc­tors in Banglore,hyderabad and other places.and my reac­tion was wow… all is not lost.i am sure you and your peo­ple must have seen the show half and have come to conclusion.we never like to see mir­ror which doesnt show what we want to see.and my obser­va­tion is reac­tions have come only from doc­tors and their family.looks like per­sonal attack in a degrad­ing manner.sad.

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    I saw the show 3 times to under­stand what was going on. And Kalpana, the issue really is that it was all one-sided. Show­ing Dr. Devishetty doesn’t change anything.

  • Norman wrote:

    Have no love lost for any star, or any so called hero.
    My heroes are the only ones who pro­tect me from intrud­ers at the bor­der, the ones who stand up in spite of the con­di­tions that pre­vail.
    Hav­ing said that I feel that Amir has pinched your weak spot, twisted a nerve. If the cap suits you you should wear it. If not just take it with a pinch of salt. He never said that all doc­tors are cheats, but there are and peo­ple know that, as many are taken for a ride.
    Will not give details as it is a known fact.
    As far as tak­ing the politi­cians and oth­ers to task, there are oth­ers who are doing a fairly good job, and we are see­ing that, with so many of the rogues going to jail. Yes they are let off, due to flaws in the sys­tem, but at least now they will think twice before they loot the Nation.
    Tak­ing Bruce Lee’s line from Enter The Dragon “Boards do not hit back” Surely Doc­tors are not boards, and they can defend them­selves if they feel that they are in the right,or if they have been hit below the belt.
    This hit­ting of the board applies to peo­ple who really can­not fight. For instance the weak, woman or chil­dren, who are bat­tered and can­not defend them­selves.
    About watch­ing the pro­gram? you have every right to switch chan­nels and watch what­ever pro­gram you desire.
    Lastly if you do not mind. You have been writ­ing for MM for years, and have a very good plat­form to air your views. Have you ever writ­ten about/against the sys­tem that you want Amir to tackle. Or is it that you have been invited only to please the mas­ters?
    If so then let some­one else do what he is doing. It is very easy to crit­i­cize some­one, when stand­ing and watch­ing things go by.

    Cheers!

  • Bhavin Jankharia wrote:

    Nor­man, doc­tors are soft boards, unfor­tu­nately. He has tweaked a spot. The prob­lem is not about the issues he has raised but the way he has done so. Vir­tu­ally every exam­ple used has been found to be wrong or the facts have been twisted to suit the case. All that needed to be done was to allow the other party to have its say. That’s all.

  • mahesh wrote:

    Great thoughts,but we should acknowl­edge the show as this issue will be debated and hope­fully stan­dards of prac­tice ques­tioned and com­pared to the good ones.

  • Bhavin,

    Opin­ions are noses or tongues and cheeks — to each his own. I endorse your views that the for­mat of the show is on the very safe side (read a stan­dard SRK flick with Yash Chopra or Karan Johar)- espe­cially the audi­ence applaud­ing on the entry of the aging super­star after each break. The man cred­ited for tread­ing a DIFFERENT PATH could have cho­sen some­thing more dif­fer­ent. On the other hand, we also need to admit to the fact that Bol­ly­wood and Cricket have a huge mind­space in our nation. An Amitabh Bachchan endors­ing Polio would have more impact than notices put up at mater­nity homes. Most of the top­ics aired till now are not prob­lems of yes­ter­day which can be fixed today for a bet­ter tomor­row!!! There are soci­etal and deep rooted reli­gious or cul­tural his­to­ries asso­ci­ated with them in our nation. Even if some incre­men­tal change for the bet­ter hap­pens (and if pur­sued and sus­tained)- the pro­gramme could be said to have made an impact.

  • […] used 600 words last month to try to say the same thing, with­out quite get­ting the mes­sage across. And since my thrust […]

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *